upgrade 2012 macbook pro graphics card to support mojave

OutputFile='/tmp/.tempMojaveTestFile.txt'įolderPath='/Library/COMPANY/SearchResults' So a Site Admin can scope the Policy to the status of that EA essentially. I have an macOS Upgrade workflow (script) that can be used to provide a 'Self Service' Upgrade to users and/or push a forced upgrade as well. Still, if you're not going to use it, it would be better to create an Advanced Search out of the criteria.Īlso, for my EA, I have a use for it outside of this as well. Our server side environment, resource wise, has more than the recommended resources for the quantity of managed devices (or at least we believe based on what support provided me). If they're only creating the Smart Group to see the number in the group, and not using the Group in a Scope some where, we highly request they do not do that. The other thing would be, what are you using this Smart Group for? We teach to our Site Admins that Smart Groups are not for Reporting purposes. We've been having some pretty noticeable performance issues in our environment and when I reached out to Jamf, they specifically said: We normally don't recommend over 10 criteria for smart groups as you will then see some performance issues I hope that this is useful for some of you guys :) Mac Pro (Late 2013, plus mid 2010 and mid 2012 models with recommended Metal-capable GPU, including MSI Gaming Radeon RX 560 and Sapphire Radeon PULSE RX Wrote a nice page about how to create a smart group for High Sierra incompatible MacsĪs we have many soon to be unsupported Macs in our infrastructure I adapted his xml-file to reflect the changed compatible models: įor creating the smart group you will need to use the api as in the original blog post described: curl -skfu username:password -T /path/to/filename.xml -X POST According to the Apple Public Beta Page the following Macs are compatible with macOS 10.14 (Mojave):

Upgrade 2012 macbook pro graphics card to support mojave